emailanalyticsGmail

Measuring Email AI Impact: Link-Level KPIs to Track Post-Gmail AI Rollout

sshorten

2026-01-30

11 min read

Shift from open rates to link-centric KPIs after Gmail’s AI rollout — detect prefetches, standardize UTMs, and measure true click-to-conversion impact.

Hook: Why your email KPIs are suddenly lying to you

If your open rates dropped in late 2025 and your campaign reports look inconsistent, you’re not imagining it. Gmail’s new AI features (built on Gemini 3) changed how messages are presented and how links and previews are fetched — and that impacts every metric that marketers rely on. You need a link-first measurement strategy that separates AI previews and prefetches from genuine human interaction, preserves attribution integrity, and gives you action-ready KPIs.

The evolution you must measure in 2026

Late 2025 and early 2026 saw Gmail roll out AI Overviews, automated summarization and richer preview/assistant features. These tools improve inbox experience but also introduce automated fetches and new “surface” interactions that can trigger pixels or requests without a human actually opening the message. The result: traditional open-rate signals and naive click counts can be inflated or misattributed.

“More AI for the Gmail inbox isn’t the end of email marketing — it’s a prompt to adapt.” — industry reporting on Gmail’s Gemini-era updates (late 2025)

Priority outcome: move from open-centric to link-centric KPIs

Open pixels are now a noisy signal. Your priority should be link-level visibility: did a human engage with content, and did that engagement lead to real outcomes? Below we define a core set of link-centric KPIs, how to capture them reliably in a post-Gmail-AI world, and tactics to diagnose AI-driven noise.

Core link-level KPIs to track

Human Click Rate (HCR)
Definition: Unique clicks minus automated/prefetch requests, divided by delivered email count. Formula: (unique_human_clicks / delivered) × 100.
Why: Separates automated fetches from real clicks so CTR reflects human intent.
Click-to-Conversion Rate (CTC)
Definition: Conversions attributed to email link clicks divided by unique_human_clicks. Formula: (email_link_conversions / unique_human_clicks) × 100.
Why: Moves measurement downstream — are clicks producing value?
Revenue per Recipient (RPR)
Definition: Total revenue from email link clicks divided by delivered recipients.
Why: Normalizes revenue to list size; useful when open rates shift but list quality remains constant.
First-Click Share
Definition: Percentage of conversions where the email link was the first tracked touch in the conversion path.
Why: Gmail AI may surface content in other surfaces; first-click share shows whether email still initiates journeys.
Assisted Email Conversions
Definition: Conversions where email contributed as a non-last touch within a chosen attribution window (e.g., 30 days).
Why: Captures email’s role in multi-touch paths, important as AI summarization changes the last-click landscape.
Preview Fetch Rate
Definition: Automated requests (AI previews/prefetch) for links or images divided by delivered emails. Formula: (prefetch_requests / delivered) × 100.
Why: Quantifies AI-driven noise and helps you tune link instrumentation and server-side logic.
Engaged Session Rate
Definition: Rate of sessions that meet an engagement threshold on landing pages (e.g., time-on-page > 15s or >1 page/screen) originating from email links.
Why: Guards against shallow, accidental clicks that inflate CTR but don’t engage users.
Time-to-Click Distribution
Definition: Histogram of elapsed time from email delivery to human click. Look for a spike of near-zero seconds (prefetch) vs human-scale delays (minutes/hours/days).
Why: Helps detect prefetch and machine-driven behavior vs real user attention spans.

Why these KPIs — the rationale

Gmail’s AI introduces more automated message processing (summaries, overviews, preview indexing). That affects the fidelity of measurement primitives such as open pixels and naïve click counters. A focus on link-level, downstream outcome metrics (CTC, RPR, engaged sessions) ensures your reporting ties to business value, not to inbox plumbing.

Implementing reliable link tracking: technical checklist

These are practical steps engineering and analytics teams must take to collect clean link-level data and preserve attribution integrity.

1. Standardize UTM + link-level identifiers

Always use UTMs on email links: utm_source=gmail, utm_medium=email, utm_campaign={campaign_id}.
Add a link_id parameter to capture which link within the email was clicked (e.g., lid=hero-cta-1).
Include a variant or experiment_id parameter for A/B tests (utm_term or utm_content are acceptable but use structured params for server parsing).

2. Use a branded short domain and redirect layer

Branded short domains (links.yourbrand.com) reduce spam flagging and increase click trust. Use a redirect/measurement layer that:

Records raw server logs (IP, user-agent, referer, accept headers, timestamps).
Implements prefetch detection heuristics (see next section).
Preserves UTM and link_id across redirects to landing pages (server-side rewrite rather than client JS reliance).

3. Detect and exclude prefetch / AI preview requests

Prefetch detection is critical. Gmail AI and other preview proxies may request links or images to build summaries. Treat these as preview events, not human clicks.

Identify automated fetches via server logs: missing referer, atypical user-agent, bursts of requests immediately after send, or requests from Google-owned IP ranges. Record but separate them from human clicks.
Use a cache-busting parameter for click-only endpoints when necessary (e.g., ephemeral tokens added client-side) — but be careful not to degrade performance or violate best practices.
Consider short-lived 302 redirects for initial requests from unknown UAs: respond with a small 204/no-content for likely prefetch agents and only redirect real browsers to the landing page.

4. Server-side tagging and first-party measurement

Cookies are less reliable in cross-site contexts. Implement server-side tracking (server-side Google Analytics/GTM or an equivalent CDP ingestion) that ingests the redirect logs and maps click events to sessions and conversions. Advantages:

Resilient to client-side blocking and privacy changes.
Enables accurate attribution models and tie-ins to CRM events.

5. Instrument landing pages for engagement signals

Measure time-on-page, scroll depth, and conversion micro-events. Use event thresholds to define an engaged session. Then tie those engaged sessions back to link_id and campaign params.

Attribution strategy: adapt for AI-driven inbox behavior

Gmail AI will make last-click and open-based attribution less trustworthy. Combine models and make them visible to stakeholders.

Recommended attribution stack

Primary: Event-first multi-touch model (server-side). Use link_id to attribute first/assist/last touches inside a 30-day lookback.
Secondary: Time-decay model for campaigns with fast conversions (e.g., promos under 7 days).
Ad-hoc: Use experimental holdouts for causal measurement — hold out a segment from email to estimate incremental lift.

Practical attribution rules to implement

Exclude preview/prefetch requests from click attribution by default.
Attribute conversions to the last human click within a pre-defined window; if no click exists, consider an email exposure (preview) as an assist only.
Track and report both last-click and multi-touch credit to avoid surprises with internal stakeholders.

Experimentation: how to prove Gmail AI’s impact

Design experiments to isolate the Gmail AI effect from seasonal or creative changes. Below are low-friction, high-signal experiments.

Experiment 1 — Prefetch detection A/B

Objective: Measure how many automated preview requests your emails receive and how they affect open metrics.
Method: Send identical emails to two holdout groups. Group A uses links routed through your plain redirect. Group B appends a temporary preview-token that causes your server to flag preview requests but not impact human clicks.
Measure: Preview fetch rate, human click rate, time-to-click distribution, and downstream conversions.

Experiment 2 — Subjectline + preview text vs. AI Overviews

Objective: Determine whether AI-generated overviews reduce clicks by answering users’ questions in the preview itself.
Method: A/B test two emails: one with a short, curiosity-driven subject + concise preview; the other with a value-heavy preview that might be fully consumed by AI summarization.
Measure: HCR, engaged session rate, and revenue per recipient.

Experiment 3 — Branded short domain impact

Objective: Measure trust gain from branded short domains vs generic tracking links.
Method: A/B send with identical creative but different link domains (branded short domain vs generic tracking domain).
Measure: Click-through rate, unsubscribe rate, spam complaints, and deliverability over 30 days.

Benchmarks and what to expect in 2026

Benchmarks vary by industry, list quality, and campaign type. Expect these directional shifts in 2026 after Gmail’s AI rollout:

Reported open rates may decline as pixels become less reliable; treat open rate as a soft signal, not a conversion proxy.
Click-based KPIs (HCR, CTC) become primary. A healthy HCR for B2C promo campaigns in 2026 will often be lower than historical open-based CTRs but more indicative of intent.
Assisted conversions from email will grow in relative importance as Gmail surfaces content in other surfaces; track multi-touch credit carefully.

Target numbers are context-dependent. Use your historical click-to-conversion ratios as a baseline and focus on relative lift after implementing prefetch detection and server-side tracking.

Real-world example (anonymized case study)

A mid-market ecommerce brand updated its email measurement in Q4 2025 after noticing faster-than-normal “opens” without matching revenue. They implemented:

Branded short domain and redirect logs
link_id and experiment_id UTMs
Server-side tagging to ingest redirect logs into their analytics

Findings after 6 weeks:

20% of their recorded clicks were automated preview/prefetch requests — these had previously inflated CTRs.
After excluding those, true human click-rate fell by 12% but click-to-conversion rose by 9% (because noise was removed).
Using first-click share they found emails started more customer journeys than last-click showed — email’s assisted conversion role increased by 18%.

Action: they focused subject line testing and CTA wording on driving clicks that lead to engaged sessions, not simply clicks. Revenue per recipient rose even though reported open rates stayed lower.

Governance, privacy and deliverability considerations

Measurement changes must respect privacy and deliverability:

Comply with privacy laws and consent frameworks (GDPR, CCPA, ePrivacy). Document why and how you track clicks and how long you store logs.
Respect mailbox provider rules: avoid link cloaking that could trigger spam filters. Use transparent redirects and a validated branded domain with proper SPF, DKIM and DMARC configuration.
Monitor spam complaints and unsubscribe rates after measurement changes; quick flags help detect deliverability problems.

Dashboards and reports your team needs

Create dashboards that bring clarity at-a-glance. Key widgets:

Human Click Rate (by campaign, by link_id)
Click-to-Conversion Rate and Revenue per Recipient
Preview Fetch Rate and top source UAs/IP ranges for fetches
Time-to-Click distribution heatmap
Assisted vs Last-Click conversions (multi-touch breakdown)
Experiment results: lift in engaged sessions and revenue per recipient

Actionable 30–90 day plan

Week 1–2: Audit current email links and analytics pipeline. Identify where opens, clicks, and redirects are tracked.
Week 3–4: Implement link_id UTM standard and route links through a branded redirect domain. Start logging raw redirect requests.
Week 5–6: Add prefetch detection heuristics to separate preview requests from human clicks. Implement server-side event ingestion.
Week 7–10: Run the three experiments (prefetch detection, preview-text testing, branded domain test). Collect statistically meaningful samples.
Month 3: Update attribution rules, dashboards, and stakeholder reporting to emphasize link-centric KPIs and business outcomes.

Future predictions (2026–2027)

Watch for these trends:

More mailbox providers will offer AI summarization — making link-level, event-first tracking a universal requirement.
Server-side and first-party measurement will become the norm for accurate attribution as client-side signals degrade.
Branded short domains and verified links will play a bigger role in deliverability and trust signals.
Attribution models will shift to include explicit preview/overview events as recognized assist signals rather than ignored noise.

Quick reference: KPI formulas

Human Click Rate (HCR) = (unique_human_clicks / delivered) × 100
Click-to-Conversion Rate (CTC) = (conversions_from_email_clicks / unique_human_clicks) × 100
Revenue per Recipient (RPR) = total_revenue_from_email_clicks / delivered
Preview Fetch Rate = (prefetch_requests / delivered) × 100
Engaged Session Rate = (engaged_sessions / total_sessions_from_email) × 100

Final takeaways

Gmail’s AI features mean open rates and naïve click counts are less reliable. The right response is not panic — it’s measurement maturity. Focus on link-centric KPIs, invest in server-side measurement, detect and exclude AI-driven prefetching, and tie clicks to downstream engagement and revenue. These steps will protect your attribution, improve your insights, and keep campaigns optimized for business outcomes in 2026.

Call to action

Start the audit today: export your last 6 months of email sends and redirect logs, then run a preview-detection analysis. Need a checklist or a starter dashboard? Contact our analytics team at shorten.info for a free 30-minute consultation and a downloadable link-tracking checklist tailored to Gmail’s AI era.

shorten

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.